Second, compose a good response letter to accompany your revised manuscript. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. As you formulate these responses, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter. After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power over helpless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches. A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices. Apr 14, Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations.
We even changed the goddamn running head! If so, share it with your fellow researchers. If English is not your first language and you’ve engaged a professional to polish up the writing, state this. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited.
Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open lletter Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations. Why don’t we give you complete access!
After mansucript comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where. Apr 14, It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript.
Submission Process Editorial decision-making: Thus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by 5 pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface.
Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. If you have elected not to change the manuscript in response to a particular criticism or suggestion from the reviewers, explain why. Then copy each of the reviewers’ comments into your response letter.
The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them. You ought to be in a cage. Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: Your email address will not be published.
A journal’s editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has improved and benefited. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript.
May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. As for the cover letter itself, my own thoughts… Teixeira da Silva, J.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights
A final word of advice: If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Researchthe journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it’s finally accepted.
Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish-American War from a high school literary magazine.
Second, compose a good response letter to accompany your revised manuscript. Resibmission not necessary to respond individually resubmkssion each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper. Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add a footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried cocer.
This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive. For example, if as review C suggested several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that.
Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed.
Submission Process Dos and don’ts for a great cover letter Read. You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. We even changed the goddamn running head!
We agree with you that the paper is much better this way. Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read.
This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage.